What She Signs They Mine - Quantifying the Gaps in FemTech Privacy Policies
in-pressAuthors: Vinuvi Nuhansa, Indra Mahakalanda, Uvini Ranaweera, Rasandie Kristhogu
Abstract: Femtech applications have revolutionized women’s healthcare, yet transparency failures are inevitable in their data privacy practices. While recent investigations highlight privacy violations in reproductive health applications, existing automated assessment frameworks lack domain-specific adaptations to evaluate femtech privacy practices. This study explores privacy policy transparency in femtech applications through domain-specific risk weighting and an XLNet-based multidimensional evaluation. The methodology compares Data Safety Section declarations with privacy policy content across 68 femtech applications listed on the Google Play Store. The comparison is supported with a custom-defined three-tier transparency assessment framework encompassing Information Coherence Analysis, Privacy Disclosure Assessment, and Privacy Protection Evaluation across comparable features. The XLNet-based classification system achieves substantial performance improvements with F1-score ranging from 0.792 to 0.845 across pre-defined privacy dimensions. The transparency assessment reveals discrepancies where privacy policies disclose a higher health data monetization compared to Data Safety Section declarations (8.8% versus 2.9%), while 17.6% of applications exhibit critical security gaps through inadequate encryption and deletion capabilities. This research advances femtech privacy assessment through domain-specific risk weighting and multi-dimensional evaluation, establishing a foundation for ethical data handling, fostering trust and accountability.
Keywords: Femtech · Health Data Privacy · Multi-label Classification · Transparency Assessment · Topic Modeling
Presented: 6th International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry ICDABI 2025